Example
Skatepark Layout
Many of the structures covered in this section have been incorporated
into this example layout. Street ramps have been positioned
to provide a number of narrow flow channels. Allowing riders
to flow from right to left and back again as the park is seen.
A configuration based upon such flow channels minimizes the
risk of collisions between users, as flow lines across the
park are not deliberately crossed.
However, connecting flat banks and quaterpipes at both ends
of the area mean that all such lines are linked and can be
accessed by simply moving along the platform. Connecting ramps
like so also increases the standard of a skatepark by offering
the potential for transfer tricks from one ramp to another.
Conclusion
The design of a skatepark is the most critical factor, second
only to the involvement of the users. If certain specifications
are not met exactly, such as the surface quality or radius
of a curve, the result can be a facility, which simply cannot
be ridden safely or effectively. In some cases, such as a
metal surfaced facility, not even used at all for
fear slippage accidents!
Unfortunately, this happens very often in the UK and is largely
due to a lack of rider/skater-approved guidelines for councils
and developers to follow. RoSPA go part way to providing a
set of guidelines, however, they have been drawn up without
any guidance or input from experienced skatepark users. We
build into our designs such essential rider input and therefore
believe we surpass the RoSPA guidelines.
We hope this document helps to promote a raised awareness
of the terminology and issues surrounding skateparks for any
parties seeking to provide a skate facility of any kind.
<< Back
To download the full
Terminology Explained Word document click here
|